Mt Whitney Webcam
Mt Williamson Webcam
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 121 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
George #30046 02/28/13 08:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 511
T
Offline
T
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 511
In response to economic and political discussions on WZ, I would like to say

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
George #30047 02/28/13 09:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
wagga Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: George
Sequestration requires the National Park Service to take a five percent – $134 million – reduction in the funds we expected, and it must happen in the remaining seven months of this fiscal year.

To repeat (Yosemite alone): Yosemite National Park Tourism Creates Over $379 Million In Local Economic Benefit

Cognitive dissonance? Anyone? Duh??


Verum audaces non gerunt indusia alba. - Ipsi dixit MCMLXXII
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
tdtz #30048 02/28/13 09:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,261
Bee Offline
Offline
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,261
Originally Posted By: tdtz
In response to economic and political discussions on WZ, I would like to say


....and no comment required.

I sort of got into the habit of getting more than nervous when the system showed signs of avalanche breakdown, because I have lived in places where you just could not ignore the outcome of governmental cave-in (the most annoying was when the borders/boundary lines would change, and The Man would show up at the door and show you the way out)


The body betrays and the weather conspires, hopefully, not on the same day.
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
Bulldog34 #30049 02/28/13 10:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Bulldog, nice intelligent reply. I concur with you that we have a national debt problem and it is serious. I've been harping about this for about 30 years, which is why I say "Welcome" to those who are finally paying attention. Now let's be real about dealing with this problem logically vs trying to bring down a President at all costs.

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
George #30054 03/01/13 09:20 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,253
W
Offline
W
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,253
George,

Republicans in the senate have said they would agree to give Mr. Obama the ability to make targeted cuts, he threatened veto.

Mr. Obama wants more taxes this is his way trying to do it. You don't eliminate crappy inefficient programs, you cut back the visual programs that will get pain on the 11 PM news and in the compliant print media.

This is circus.

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
wbtravis #30056 03/01/13 11:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 6
H
Offline
H
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 6
Left coaster Pelosi :

"I think some people may have thought sequester meant 'shut down of government.' No it means more like 'hold hostage all the things you care about so we can have across-the-board cuts'."

What's wrong with across-the-board cuts?
They are much better than continuing or increasing all the entitled and out-of-control giveaways that the Dems and their sanctimonious President refuse to cut.

There is no free lunch. Somebody has to pay for it.

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
Harvey Lankford #30058 03/01/13 01:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
wagga Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1


Verum audaces non gerunt indusia alba. - Ipsi dixit MCMLXXII
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
Harvey Lankford #30062 03/01/13 05:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,505
Likes: 103
S
Offline
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,505
Likes: 103
Overall, I think all the posts here have been respectful and on topic, for the most part. Not sure if several of the above posts fit into that category.

There are people here who align their thinking with both of the major parties. Making less than respectful comments about one particular party's agenda / representative is just going to inflame people with opposite views. Lets leave those comments to the commentators who make money playing to their fans.

I hope everyone understands: This is a really tough time, and everyone's list of crappy inefficient programs and out-of-control giveaways is going to be all over the spectrum.

Thanks.

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
Steve C #30065 03/01/13 06:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
Offline
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 2
Steve, I think it's the board's version of cabin fever. It's that time of year.

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
Bulldog34 #30068 03/01/13 07:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
wagga Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
Done.

Without comment...



Verum audaces non gerunt indusia alba. - Ipsi dixit MCMLXXII
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
wagga #30076 03/02/13 12:28 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,505
Likes: 103
S
Offline
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,505
Likes: 103
Open the window, stick your head out and yell... mad eek mad

Thanks wagga, I needed that.

Best five minutes today. Happy Sequester Friday!


Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
George #30083 03/02/13 11:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
G
Woodsy Guy
Offline
Woodsy Guy
G
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
OK. This is a little better presented by NPS Director Jarvis:

http://goo.gl/8DdTT



None of the views expressed here in any way represent those of the unidentified agency that I work for or, often, reality. It's just me, fired up by coffee and powerful prose.
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
George #30087 03/02/13 02:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Director Jarvis comes across like an intelligent hard working person who might actually contribute to society, but we know that can be true, he's part of our government, one of those "takers" milking us tax payers.

If you look really close in the background, I think I see one of those 2010 protest signs, "Keep the government out of our National Parks!" next to the, "Keep the government out of our Medicare" sign. shocked

Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
SierraNevada #30093 03/03/13 10:50 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
G
Woodsy Guy
Offline
Woodsy Guy
G
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
Wagga

Grazie! Grazie!! That (and Hospital) is one of the great movie moments.

Jarvis' live comment was more interesting and better said than what seemed like a flack-written memo aimed less towards employees (which is who it went to) than the press. Part of the problem with this sequestration is that it's not a sudden loss of jobs, credit etc., it's a slow moving train wreck. So there's no dramatic "closed" sign for people to get upset and start writing their representatives.

Wbtravis is right that it's a circus. But how do you get people to realize that this is important and will have long-term consequences? Some years ago, FEMA was drastically cut and leadership turned over to patronage positions. This was not a problem until there was a disaster and the critical nature of federal emergency response and support was dramatically shown. To a certain extent, I'm sympathetic to tdz on a discussion of economics/budget in the outdoorsy pages of this forum, but you can't separate the future of our collective access and enjoyment of places like, say, Reflection Lake from what's going on in these endless budget crisis.

Everyone says to "cut government spending" but when asked about specifics, they actually support raising spending for almost every service that government offers. Everyone says cut waste and tax loopholes but seem unwilling to actually do it. Except for a small but determined band of tea party types, government is important (well until you try interfere with their medicare and SS...).

California went through this exact sequence over the last several years. (Yes, the "left coast" -- is that really helpful to a discussion?). After 2 years of shortened hours for government services, layoffs of teachers, police and fire, a stagnant economy etc., voters supported a temporary raise in taxes. In the process, the republican party -- who had uncompromisingly opposed any budget discussion that involved raising revenue -- saw their registration go down to 26%, lose both houses and have no representatives in higher office in the state. They were ultimately seen as the party of "no" and unhelpful to meaningful reform.

We see the exact same response at the federal level:
http://goo.gl/nifyh

So, absolutely correct that there is no free lunch, but people want government services and, as Bulldog and others here say, are willing to pay parks a little more to get them.

Wbtracis is again right that "Europe is the wake up call everyone wants to ignore" but the lesson is that ignoring the importance of government spending in the midst of a serious recession just makes things far worse. Arguably, you can and should find ways to eventually reduce some types of projected government spending (e.g. medicare & SS), but to cut services & jobs in a recession is disastrous:

www.businessinsider.com/european-economic-disaster-2013-3

Which is all to say that a discussion anywhere on the importance of government in our day to day lives -- and how to pay for it -- is, however boring or controversial, an important one to have.


George
Public Servant


None of the views expressed here in any way represent those of the unidentified agency that I work for or, often, reality. It's just me, fired up by coffee and powerful prose.
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
George #30094 03/03/13 07:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
wagga Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 1
Well, George, thank you. Least I could do.

It seems to me that the NPS is being punished for doing an honest job with the funds available - i.e. being efficient. As far as I can tell, the Park Service has very little fat, and, because the bigger parks bring in tourist dollars, are in reality self-supporting.


Verum audaces non gerunt indusia alba. - Ipsi dixit MCMLXXII
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
wagga #30099 03/04/13 09:03 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,253
W
Offline
W
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,253
George,

FDR doubled the size of the federal government in his first term...the result...the Depression of 1937.

Obama got his trillion and his administration said unemployment would not exceed 8%...the result was over 10% unemployment rate and lowering of the labor participation rate. I don't care what the unemployment rate is there are less people working today that 4 years ago with a larger population. If you call that a success, I would like to know what failure looks like.

The federal government is spending 25% of GDP. Mr. Obama does not want a tax increase to reduce the deficit but to increase the size and scope of government beyond what it is today.

So, don't tell me spending what we don't have works...it did not in 1933 or in 2009.





Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
wbtravis #30101 03/04/13 10:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,572
Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,572
Hee-hee. I love Travis's material. Very creative. I wonder if he writes it himself. Cucamonga is pretty close to Hollywood, and always a great source of humor. Keep it up, man, you kill.


Wherever you go, there you are.
SPOTMe!
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
saltydog #30102 03/04/13 12:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 3
Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 3
Get them bail-out bags aka "bug-out bags" ready...



We got ours ready...


Journey well...
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
wagga #30103 03/04/13 01:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
G
Woodsy Guy
Offline
Woodsy Guy
G
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
Quote:
It seems to me that the NPS is being punished for doing an honest job with the funds available - i.e. being efficient. As far as I can tell, the Park Service has very little fat, and, because the bigger parks bring in tourist dollars, are in reality self-supporting.


I like to think so. I don't see much sign of huge waste in NPS. It's a common complaint among those of us below decks to say that we're top-heavy with middle managers; creeping in of specialty positions (I'll, um, not name names...) & etc. I think there's definitely some truth in that but it only shows up as a drain when we get into these cat fights over money. And, of course, those aren't the positions that get cut. One guess on who does get cut to save money?

I'm less sure of my facts, but believe this is what's happened to USFS over the years. Growing management & specialist positions and decreasing field people. As a result, not as much trail work; cleaning camps and taking care of wilderness & backcountry.

In another life, I'm Prez of one of our ranger organizations (Ranger Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police). When a clueless Congressman grumped about complaints of cuts in NPS, he said: "They just have to do more with less" one of our members said "no, I'm going to do less with less." At a certain point, you just get tired of putting in unpaid hours because there's no budget and some things just have to be done. Like teachers, I doubt there's a single ranger who doesn't put in at least a couple of hours of unpaid work each week -- whether it's finishing a report at home; coming in for training on a day off or just answering visitor questions on the way out the door.

Getting paid in sunsets is the old cliche, though it's used only ironically nowadays. Most of us want to get paid in, well, money... .



None of the views expressed here in any way represent those of the unidentified agency that I work for or, often, reality. It's just me, fired up by coffee and powerful prose.
Re: Yosemite, Congress & Sequestering
wbtravis #30104 03/04/13 01:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
G
Woodsy Guy
Offline
Woodsy Guy
G
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
Ah, I see Mr. Travis using the always reliable Herbert Hoover Playbook! I think this is where Santayana's classic: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" comes in. A teensy bit arcane (and only if you can stand yet another -- auugggghhhhh! -- Krugman reference) re 1937:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/a-global-1937/


None of the views expressed here in any way represent those of the unidentified agency that I work for or, often, reality. It's just me, fired up by coffee and powerful prose.
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4
(Release build 20200307)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.098s Queries: 54 (0.090s) Memory: 0.6873 MB (Peak: 0.8240 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-28 13:34:10 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS