Originally Posted By: Yury
Yes, Calicokat is entitled to put watermarks on his photographs. And it definitely makes sense for high resolution images.

However even professional photographers often put less obtrusive signatures on the low resolution versions of their photos. Nobody can prevent Calicokat to use Smugmug for commercial photos and another site for low resolution images with less prominent signature/watermark/copyright.


Yury - just because you have plenty of time to sit around eating cashews and watching reruns of The View, postulating whether Captain Kirk (had he lived in Thousand Oaks) would have had horse property or not, dividing up your photos between several hosting sites JUST to satisfy the desire of some random forum member to have a less intrusive watermark on a low-res photo - all the while somehow managing not to get laid...doesn't mean the rest of us do.

My suggestion would be to remove that rather large pine cone from where it rests. True, no one can prevent Jim from posting his photos to several different websites, much in the same way that no one can prevent a person from typing pointless things on an online forum.