Originally Posted By: KevinR
Originally Posted By: tdtz
Quote:
In case anyone is still reading the sledge-hammer harangues in this thread:

I don't think that George is going to appreciate that you characterized his posts as "sledge-hammer harangues"


I wouldn't for an instant put George's posts in the same category as yours smile

And perhaps harangues is wrong word. Mindless polemics may be more apt.


Let's see we have someone complaining about harangues and mindless polemics whose contributions to this thread have been...

No need for a quiz. Most of us know that's the party which can propose actual solutions, is able to form sentences beyond two letters, who regard trans-vaginal probes as a part of public policy as an abomination, and who may well hold the Presidency for the next 12 years.

Any questions, Mr West?

---

Interesting graphic from Media Matters

---

Paul Krugman has an interesting piece today in the NYT -

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/08/opinio...130308&_r=0

---

Originally Posted By: tdtz
...More later on the Krugman piece. It deserves a spotlight.


It certainly does. He didn't win the Nobel prize because he posted economic gibberish under a pseudonym on an internet BB.

At least there's something I can agree with you on!

---

In case anyone is still reading the sledge-hammer harangues in this thread:

Paul Krugman Declares Personal Bankruptcy

Paul Krugman

_____

I do find more than a bit irony in this.