Sorry: Dumb article, clickbait headline. More and more typical of "Outside" ragazine. No definition or criteria for "dangerous" no stats at all on a couple and no facts at all on Half-Dome, norecognition of technical routes or climbs, so no distinction between trails and class 5 climbing, no weighting for numbers visiting. And come on, Denali doesn't make the list? Come on. Its just an arbitrary list: no meaning, no help. OF course, the title is not "The five most dangerous, but "Five OF the most dangerous", so I suppose it is accurate if means something like "Five of the 200 or so most dangerous" "Outside" has long since made my subscription cancellation pile, along with "Sierra" and the LL Bean Catalog
Last edited by saltydog; 09/08/18 01:38 PM.
