Mt Whitney Webcam
Mt Williamson Webcam
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 14 guests, and 37 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Snowpack
Steve C #34186 12/06/13 12:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11
Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11
This one was a bit more of a challenge!

I'm sure I missed some creditable peaks. Sorry, my eyes started hurting...

Last edited by Dave Alden; 12/06/13 12:33 PM.
Re: Snowpack
saltydog #34190 12/06/13 09:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Originally Posted By: saltydog
SN: Your initial observation is correct, but it contradicts your conclusion about SONGS:

Originally Posted By: SierraNevada

So Cal Edison generates as much hydropower as they can each year from water stored in Edison and Florence, and their entire Northern & Eastern Hydro Systems, so these lakes get pretty darn low every fall anyway. The drastic drawdown shown in the photos of this thread might be associated more with San Onofre nuclear plant being decommissioned than the drought.


[Emphasis added] Since they generate as much as they can every year, they can't can't generate any more, whether SONGS is down or not. So the drastic drawdown can't be due to the SONGS outage, it can only be due to the normal production and the abnormal lack of replenishment.

Hey, I'm only speculating here, Dog. But I'm thinking they used the water to generate hydropower earlier than usual during peak demand in summer to make up for lost power at San Onofre. But maybe they just needed the water for Huntington and Shaver Lakes, I really don't know. Meeting with them soon, I'll ask.

Re: Snowpack
Dave Alden #34191 12/07/13 01:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,524
Likes: 105
S
Offline
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,524
Likes: 105
Originally Posted By: Dave Alden
This one was a bit more of a challenge!
I'm sure I missed some creditable peaks. Sorry, my eyes started hurting...


I'll bet your eyes hurt! Thanks so much! It is so cool that ten of the California Fourteeners show up in the picture.

I am curious what tools you used to identify the peaks. Are you a Google Earth expert, or...?

Re: Snowpack
Steve C #34192 12/07/13 10:27 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 453
Likes: 1
A
Offline
A
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 453
Likes: 1
Steve and Dave, thanks for taking the picture and for labeling it. That is very cool looking at Sierra and familiar peaks from a different perspective. like!

Re: Snowpack
Anonymous1 #34195 12/07/13 11:54 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 6
H
Offline
H
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 6
a little late finding my August 2013 South Lake picture but here it is





Re: Snowpack
Harvey Lankford #34196 12/07/13 01:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,572
OP Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,572
Originally Posted By: Harvey Lankford
a little late finding my August 2013 South Lake picture but here it is
[img:left]



Wow: that is dry!!


Wherever you go, there you are.
SPOTMe!
Re: Snowpack
saltydog #34197 12/07/13 04:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 908
Likes: 2
B
Offline
B
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 908
Likes: 2
By the end of September, it was much lower than that. However, the high altitude lakes seem to be doing okay at that time(Long lake, Spearhead Lake, Bishop Lake, Blue Lake, Hungry Packer Lake, etc.)

Keep in mind that both South Lake and Lake Sabrina are artificial lakes, not natural, except for a small part of upper Sabrina. Before the dams were built, the South and Middle forks of Bishop Creek flowed unimpeded. This year SCE was letting water run straight through without attempting to store it, in order to continue providing water for the down-stream power generating stations.

If the current storms are any indication, the snow pack is slowly building up again. We'll keep our fingers crossed!

Last edited by Bob West; 12/07/13 04:44 PM.
Re: Snowpack
Steve C #34205 12/09/13 12:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11
Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11
I use Google Earth and other GIS based programs at work every day. Things are a little slow right now, so I have time to label peaks.
Great pictures by the way!

Re: Snowpack
Dave Alden #34839 01/07/14 12:17 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
As everyone should realize, the snowpack is very very low this year. I think 2013 was the driest year in CA recorded history and there's no precip on the horizon for January so far. On the bright side, the hiking was great around Lake Tahoe over the holidays with warm sunny weather and only occasional use of microspikes.

AP article on the recent snow survey

Re: Snowpack
SierraNevada #35110 02/06/14 09:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Couple feet on the way over the weekend for the Tahoe area!

Re: Snowpack
SierraNevada #35112 02/06/14 10:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,524
Likes: 105
S
Offline
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,524
Likes: 105
We got an inch of precip down this way today. It poured for a long time. YES!!!

Re: Snowpack
Steve C #35113 02/07/14 06:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,034
Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,034
The recent bump in precip gave the year a chance to not go down as the driest on record, at least in the southern third. The north is still well in record low range

bump in graph

Re: Snowpack
Fishmonger #35115 02/07/14 07:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Forecast now predicts stronger warming trend with snow turning to rain on Sunday. Snow levels around 8,000-8,500 around Tahoe. That would be bad for snowpack and skiing.

If the climate models happen to be correct instead of a hoax, then we'll have a lot more of these winters. California winters have a lot of variability, and there will be extremes in the other direction of course. Talking about trends over time.

Re: Snowpack
saltydog #35130 02/13/14 08:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 101
K
Offline
K
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 101
Hi
Visiting the site after several months. How is the snow situation in Sierras? Is it below 100%. I am planning for the HST and want to make sure that I hike during the best flower season. July or August? or even earlier?
Thanks!

Re: Snowpack
Krishna #35131 02/13/14 09:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,261
Bee Offline
Offline
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,261
Hi Krishna. This is going to be a tricky year for flowers, because while the general snowpack is much much lower than usual (some 30% of normal is one of the numbers I have read), there will still have to be warm enough temperatures to melt what is there (for the flowers to poke through) Normally, I have found that middle July is good for around 8-9 thousand feet, and middle/second week of August is good for the high country (based on Northern Sierra & Hikes to Dana, which is usually still covered in snow until the end of June - starting elev around 9.5 thousand ft, ends at 13 thousand). It might be earlier this year; I will be interested to read what others have to say.


The body betrays and the weather conspires, hopefully, not on the same day.
Re: Snowpack
Bee #35132 02/13/14 04:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,034
Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,034
19% of normal in the southern Sierra. Flowers in June, even earlier at low elevations

Snow Water Content Graph

We're skipping our April ski trip as there is nothing to ski on, and are planning an early summer hike instead.

Re: Snowpack
Fishmonger #35133 02/13/14 07:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,158
I hate to quibble with you Fishmonger (I do enjoy some quibbling with others now and then), but technically it's 27% of "normal" in the southern Sierra for an average Feb 1st. The 19% you cite is relative to the average April 1 water content, April 1 being the last snow survey of the season.

We're well below normal and nothing big on the horizon. Only a Miracle March could make a difference at this point. The mighty Groundhog says wildflowers and mosquitoes will start early, creek crossings will be easier, and fires will be raging this summer and fall.

Re: Snowpack
Fishmonger #35135 02/14/14 12:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 101
K
Offline
K
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 101
Thanks! On the other hand this year plenty of cross country around here in Chicago. The Dupage Forest Dept started grooming the Waterfall glen trails and I had several weekends of cross country! Fantastic powder snow on well groomed trails. We are expecting another 2 to 3 in tomorrow. Cant ask for more!

Re: Snowpack
Krishna #35136 02/14/14 12:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 579
Likes: 3
Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 579
Likes: 3
On the other hand, I'm sure many of your neighbors are asking for less smirk

Re: Snowpack
SierraNevada #35137 02/14/14 06:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,034
Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,034
Originally Posted By: SierraNevada
I hate to quibble with you Fishmonger (I do enjoy some quibbling with others now and then), but technically it's 27% of "normal" in the southern Sierra for an average Feb 1st. The 19% you cite is relative to the average April 1 water content, April 1 being the last snow survey of the season.


woohoo 27% of normal...

well, that still sucks. The other 73% precip are in my yard it seems. 34 days in a row below 32F here, and getting colder again. Nothing melts here. Snow and ice piling up, even without a single big storm. The jet stream is all screwed up and long term, I suppose we need to get used to crazy patterns like this.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4
(Release build 20200307)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 55 (0.041s) Memory: 0.6781 MB (Peak: 0.8270 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-11-01 00:59:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS