*** Three of the six alternatives are various levels of decreasing visitor access and increasing restrictions. ***
It is kind of a confusing mess. However, a first approximation is that only one of the proposed alternatives truly limits visitor use. As near as I can tell, most of them are some variation on what is currently the status quo.
George, it might not seem like a big change, but half of the alternatives decrease visitor access and increase restrictions. Seems like an agenda to me.
• "Trailhead quotas would be reduced for
certain high use trailheads" (Alt4) "
Wilderness-wide" (Alt5) and "
substantially reduced" (Alt6).
• The NPS would work with USFS to add missing trailheads to quota system (Alt 3-6)
