Steve,
I've tried 2 or 3 times to bring it back to solar...errr...oil...errr...gasoline. Ken doesn't want to substantial his assertion that price of gasoline is subsidized in this country. I offered up a recent COMEX price for unleaded as a basis.
I did not take this neither to oil nor WW II, others did. I just stated the Patton analogy was faulty.
I will go back to...if you subsidize solar or wind, for that matter. What are you willing to give up? The EU is a little pissy with the UK these days for the folly of subsidizing wind power at 3 times the wholesale price.
All this does is make the rich richer at the expense of those who can least afford it. I thought the group of folks who champion this kind of thing also champion income inequality...just saying. You can't have both, these interest compete.
